Showing posts with label women's history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women's history. Show all posts

Monday, June 3, 2013

Brownie Wise - Tupperware's First Lady


Brownie Wise, born in 1913, grew up in a broken home in rural Georgia. Her mother, a traveling Union organizer, often left her with cousins for long stretches of time. In 1936, she met and married Robert Wise. Robert took a job with Ford Motor Company and the couple relocated to Detroit. Their son, Jerry, was born in 1938. Although Brownie wrote pieces for a Detroit newspaper column about her idealic life, it was fiction. Robert was a violent alcoholic and they were divorced in 1942.

Earl Tupper was constantly inventing things, but after working in a plastics factory, he decided that he could go into business for himself and invented the Tupperware seal that has made the product so successful. Tupperware was a successful product being sold at home parties and in department stores when Brownie Wise began to sell it in the late 1940s.

After the divorce, Brownie took classes and became a secretary, but she also sold Stanley Home products in home parties to make extra money. Sixteen year old Gary McDonald was also a successful Stanley Home party seller and suggested to Brownie that they start a business selling Tupperware at home parties, which they did. Soon they were so successful that they caught the attention of Earl Tupper. Brownie convinced Tupper that he should sell his products only at home parties. So Earl pulled his product out of the department stores and hired Brownie, eventually making her Vice-president of Sales.



Brownie built up the home party business, establishing headquarters in Kissimee Florida, holding jubilee celebrations, and traveling extensively across the country. She was so successful that in 1954, she became the first woman to be featured on the cover of Business Week magazine.



But Brownie wasn’t a feminist pioneer. Although Tupperware was largely a women’s business, Brownie surrounded herself with male executives. Women could be dealers and managers, but distributorships were offered to husband and wife couples where the husband was expected to quit his job and handle the distribution aspect of the business. Regional positions were the exclusive provenance of men.

In 1957, trouble began to brew between Earl Tupper and Brownie. He began to question some of her expenses, but she consistently refused to go to Rhode Island with her books for Earl to examine. Finally, Earl went to Florida and the end result was Brownie being fired.

Even though she tried to start a new company, Brownie never again had the same success she experienced with Tupperware. She pioneered methods and strategies that are used by many other companies even today. Earl Tupper sold the company and it continued to expand. Tupperware is sold today in over 100 countries.

Saturday, March 2, 2013

Fannie Farmer - Teaching America to Cook

On August 23, 1902, Fannie Farmer opened Miss Farmer’s School of Cookery in Boston. Fannie Farmer was an advocate for using standardized measurements in recipes consequently making cooking in the home easier for many women. Her work at the school, lectures, and cookbooks changed the way Americans cooked.

Fannie Farmer around 1900 (Courtesy of the Boston Public Library)

Last weekend my sister and I were going through some books that my mom was getting rid of. One of them was a duplicate copy of The Fannie Farmer Cookbook. My sister, Teresa, and I are what we call “dump” cooks. We’re both comfortable dumping in a little of this and a little of that, but our mom and other sister prefer recipes with precise measurements. Nevertheless, Teresa and I both have copies of The Fannie Farmer Cookbook that we have referred to over the years along with many other women.

Fannie Farmer was born March 23, 1857 to a family that believed in education for women, but due to a stroke in her teens she was unable to finish high school or go to college. Unable to walk, she remained at home and began to cook. She became so proficient that her mother’s boarding house became known for the quality of meals that were served. Once she regained the ability to walk, she attended the Boston Cooking School which was founded in 1879 to promote a scientific approach to cooking, and specifically to train women to be cooking teachers. Fannie graduated in 1889, and as one of its top students became the principal of the school in 1891.

Fannie with a student

In 1896, Fannie published The Boston Cooking School Cookbook. The publisher didn’t expect it to be a big seller, so the initial printing of 3000 copies was at the author’s expense. They definitely misjudged its popularity. It is still in print today. Currently in its 13th addition, the 10th edition published in 1959 was called The All New Fannie Farmer Boston Cooking School Cookbook, and the 11th edition published in 1965 was the first to be called The Fannie Farmer Cookbook.

The Boston Cooking School Cookbook was much more than a recipe book. It also included information about household management, sanitation, nutrition, and preserving fruits and vegetables. Nothing was left out from discussion of boiling point to “how to build a fire” and “boning a bird.” But its most significant contribution to American cooking was in Fannie’s discussion of standard measurements and the idea of level measurements. A teacup of flour became a level cup of flour, and a piece of butter became a specific number of level tablespoons.


In 1904, Fannie published a book that would result in her lecturing to Harvard medical students. Food and Cookery for the Sick and Convalescent gave information on the digestive system, food recommendations for specific diseases, nutrition for children, and emphasized the appearance, taste, and presentation of food for the sick.

Due to another stroke, Fannie was confined to a wheelchair for the last 7 years of her life, but she continued to lecture and write. Her lectures were published by the Boston Evening Transcript and republished in newspapers across the country. Fannie gave her last lecture 10 days before her death on January 15, 1915.

A list of her books from Wikipedia
  • Farmer, Fannie Merritt. Boston Cooking-School Cook Book. (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company, 1896). A complete list of editions may be found at Boston Cooking-School Cook Book.
  • Farmer, Fannie Merritt. Chafing Dish Possibilities. (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company, 1898).
  • Farmer, Fannie Merritt. Food and Cookery for the Sick and Convalescent. (Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1904).
  • Farmer, Fannie Merritt. What to Have for Dinner: Containing Menus with Recipes for their Preparation. (New York, NY: Dodge Publishing Company, 1905). Re-published (by Dodge) in 1914 under the title A Book of Good Dinners for My Friend; or “What to Have for Dinner”.
  • Farmer, Fannie Merritt. Catering for Special Occasions, with Menus and Recipes. (Philadelphia, PA: D. McKay, 1911).
  • Farmer, Fannie Merritt. New Book of Cookery, A. Eight-hundred and Sixty Recipes Covering the Whole Range of Cookery. (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company, 1912).
  • Farmer, Fannie Merritt, ed. Priscilla Cook Book for Everyday Housekeepers, The. (Boston, MA: The Priscilla Publishing Company, 1913)
You can download several of Fannie’s cookbooks for which the copyright has expired using the links below.

The Boston Cooking School Cookbook (1896 version)
Food and Cookery for the Sick and Convalescent (1904)

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Marian Anderson, Eleanor Roosevelt, and the DAR

On Easter Sunday, April 9, 1939, Marian Anderson performed in what may be her most famous concert in the United States. It began with a stirring rendition of “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. The interracial crowd was estimated at 75,000 and the radio audience in the millions. Her final selection was the Negro spiritual “Nobody Knows the Trouble I’ve Seen” and in finishing this concert, Marian became a powerful symbol for African American artists, in part because the concert came about due to the bigotry of others.

Marian Anderson was born in 1897 to John Berkley Anderson and his wife Annie Delilah Rucker. The Andersons were a devout Christian family with significant musical talent. (Marian and both of her younger sisters would all go on to become singers.) At the age of six, Marian’s Aunt Mary convinced her to sing in the church choir. This gave her the opportunity to sing solos and duets and she soon began singing at other functions around the community.

After graduating high school, Marian wanted to study music at the Philadelphia Music Academy, but was rejected because she was black. Instead she studied privately with the help of people in her community. She won a contest to sing with the New York Philharmonic in 1925 and after a number of other concerts sang at Carnegie Hall. But racial prejudice made it difficult to build a career in the United States, so she moved to Europe.



Marian’s career in Europe was very successful. She toured and made contacts that would help form her future career, including Kosti Vehanen and Sol Hurok who would be her accompanist/vocal coach and manager, respectively, for the rest of her career. She also made a profound impression on the composer Jean Sibelius who became her friend and adapted and composed songs for Marian throughout her career. Although she had thousands of fans in Europe, Hurok convinced Marian to return to the US in the late 1930s where she toured and became famous, although racial prejudice still presented roadblocks.

Because she was so popular, in 1939 when Howard University planned to host a concert with Marian, a large turnout was expected. The only hall large enough to hold the expected crowd was Constitution Hall belonging to the Daughters of the American Revolution. When they were approached, the DAR refused to allow a black artist to perform in the Hall. This caused quite a stir which prompted the resignation of many members, including First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt.



The First Lady had considered what to do. She wrote in her newspaper column about the sometimes difficult choice of whether to remain in an organization and work for change from within, or to leave the organization in protest. At times Eleanor felt that making a problem public was not the best strategy, but the rejection of Marian Anderson by the DAR was already public, so she chose to leave the organization and let it be known why.

Not long before this, Eleanor had attended the Southern Conference on Human Welfare in Birmingham, Alabama. The Conference had a large number of black delegates, but the city insisted that they adhere to the cities segregation laws. When Eleanor arrived with her friend Mary McLeod Bethune, the police told her that she couldn’t sit with her friend. Her solution was to have her chair moved to the center aisle where she would sit neither on the “white” side nor the “colored” side. This caused quite a stir as did her resignation from the DAR.

Eleanor’s decision to resign from the DAR received world-wide attention. She had her opponents, but many more who supported her decision. In the wake of the uproar, Walter White, executive secretary of the NAACP, and Marian’s manager Sol Hurok came up with the idea of an open air concert in front of the Lincoln Memorial. With the support of both the President and First Lady, they approached Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes to arrange it. The gathering was a great success.



Marian Anderson went on to have a long distinguished career. She was the first African American to perform at the Metropolitan Opera; she continued to tour in Europe and toured Australia, India, and the Far East; and she entertained troops during WWII. In 1943, she even performed at Constitution Hall at the invitation of the DAR as a benefit for the Red Cross.

It seems fitting that Marian would begin her final concert tour at Constitution Hall in October 1964 and end at Carnegie Hall on April 18, 1965. Although officially retired she continued to appear publicly. She was active in the civil rights movement, giving benefit concerts and inspiring many others. Marian was the recipient of many awards during her life including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award, the United Nations Peace Prize, and the George Peabody Medal.

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Anne Hutchinson - Running Afoul of the State Church


The “separation of church and state” has been a continuing issue in our American history. Most often it comes up with regard to our public schools. Over the years, these issues have ended up in the courts, with things being decided in the favor of keeping religion out of the schools, but the issues never really go away. Still prayers are said before football games, at graduations, and even as late as 2004 the school board of Dover, Pennsylvania tried to introduce Creationism into the high school biology classroom in the form of Intelligent Design.

I’m not surprised that the effort continues. The United States is one of the most religious nations on earth with hundreds of different religions and Christian denominations.  What does surprise me, however, is that the effort is usually led by evangelical Christians. The reason this surprises me is that evangelical Christians were in large part the driving force behind the First Amendment clause being written into the Constitution.

We don’t have a state religion in the United States, but that wasn’t always the case. During colonial America, many colonies did have official religions that were supported by the state and tax money. In the north, the Congregationalist church (formerly the Puritans) was the official church of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire, in the south, the Anglican Church was the official church of Maryland, Virginia, the Carolinas, and Georgia. There certainly were states without an official religion, most notably Rhode Island which was established on the principle of freedom of religion. But in many of these colonies, evangelicals found themselves at odds with the established churches. One person who is of particular importance to the idea of “separation of church and state” is Jeremiah Moore. Taking up the cause of Moore and many other Baptist preachers who had been arrested for preaching without a license in Virginia, Thomas Jefferson would introduce a bill into the legislature that would eventually be passed and sever the tie between the Anglican Church and the state of Virginia. He would then go on, with others, to insist on the addition of a clause in the Constitution that ensured freedom of religion.

Evangelicalism is characterized by the belief that you can have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ through the Holy Spirit. Although Evangelicalism didn’t really begin as a movement until the 1730s, the idea that you could have this communion with God through the Holy Spirit did exist. One woman who believed and taught this idea is Anne Hutchinson.

Anne Hutchinson, born Anne Marbury in 1591, was the daughter of an Anglican minister in England. Her father had strong Puritan leanings and was censured by the church on more than one occasion. He spent time in prison for his preaching and for a time was under house arrest. He was a strong believer in education and in a time that it was unusual for women to be educated, he taught both his boys and his girls.  At the age of 21, not long after her father’s death, Anne married William Hutchinson. Together they began to follow the teachings of John Cotton and John Wheelwright. These two ministers preached similar messages emphasizing grace and a “moment of conversion”, and deemphasizing a salvation based on works.

By 1633, Cotton’s message, which didn’t strictly adhere to the Anglican Church doctrines, was attracting attention from the church and he found it necessary to flee to America. After a time, Anne felt the Spirit leading her to follow Cotton to Massachusetts and she and William, with their 11 children, sailed for Boston in 1634. They flourished in Boston. William was successful in trade, and Anne found a place in the community helping others and attending childbirths where women often congregated. At some point, she began to share with these women the message she had learned from Cotton and Wheelwright.

Men would often congregate to discuss recent sermons and theology, but there were no such meetings for women. As more and more women became interested in what Anne had to say, she began to have meetings for them in her home. This eventually led to meetings twice a week attended by as many as 80 people. They would review the sermon, discuss it’s meaning, and often disagree with it. Anne began to espouse her own teachings. Principle among them was the “covenant of grace” as opposed to the “covenant of works.” She emphasized “an intuition of the Spirit” or “a personal revelation” as the true evidence of a person’s salvation rather than their good behavior.

In 1636, it became clear to officials in Boston, that many people were developing opinions that weren’t considered orthodox within the church. The fault for this was laid at the feet of Cotton, Hutchinson, and Wheelwright (who had recently arrived from England.) A number of meetings were held, particularly with Cotton, to try to sort out what his specific teachings were and where they differed from the official church doctrine. (This controversy still exists today between different denominations, with some emphasizing that works have nothing to do with the state of your salvation, and others emphasizing that your faith is not assured unless there is evidence of the fruit of good works.)  By late 1636, things came to a head and Hutchinson and her followers were accused of heresy.

Anne was accused of antinomianism and familism. Antinomianism literally means “against the law” and Familism was a sect that emphasized a feeling of divine love. Both of these ideas were considered to be dangerous for fear that they could lead to immoral behavior. Neither accusation is really accurate. While Anne believed that she and others like her, received salvation purely by the grace of God and that this could be experienced and felt by the believer, thereby providing “proof” to the individual, they were not immoral people. By all accounts, Anne was highly respected in the community and very active in helping people, in spite of having a large family of her own.

By 1637 when Anne came to trial, her primary accuser John Winthrop had become governor of Massachusetts. He feared that if the people in the colony did not remain “pure” that God would not protect them. It was a difficult life for the settlers. Just before Anne’s trial, the settlers had engaged in a war with the Pequot Indians. Many Puritans believed that Indian attacks, poor crops, natural disasters, or any misfortune was God’s judgment for sin.  Another aspect of this trial was that Anne had risen to a place in the community that Winthrop did not deem “fitting to her sex.” Men had begun to attend Anne’s meetings. In fact, one of her admirers was the previous governor of the colony, Sir Henry Vane. It was not considered proper for a woman to teach men. Cotton, in an attempt to distance himself from Anne, even accused her of promoting licentious behavior by having men and women together in her home for these meetings. The entire situation was filled with politics, fear of judgment, and probably no small amount of misogyny.

On the first day of the trial, Anne met their arguments point for point, probably frustrating them greatly. However, on the second day, Anne gave them her message. She told them that she was assured of her salvation because of a “personal revelation.” The court deemed her a heretic and sentenced her to banishment from Massachusetts. She remained under house arrest throughout the winter in the home of Joseph Weld in Roxbury. It was a severe winter in which she was separated from her family.

In the spring, a church trial was held, in which Anne was excommunicated. During the winter, William and some other men made plans to leave Massachusetts. Twenty-three men would ultimately sign what became known as the Portsmouth Compact. They purchased Aquiddeck Island from the Narragansetts and formed a new settlement. This was near Providence Plantations which had been established by Roger Williams with specific provisions for freedom of religion.

At some point after the death of William in 1641, Anne and some of her family moved to a place in eastern New York. Here she and all but one of her children and other family members were massacred by the Indians. She had had good relationships with the Narragansett Indians in Portsmouth and may not have realized how tense the relationships were in her new home. Her daughter Susanna was away from the house and by some accounts was captured and held for several years before being ransomed by to her remaining family in Boston.

As with many historical figures Anne’s life is viewed through many lenses. She is seen as a heretic, a libertine, and a feminist, or as a woman who simply followed the dictates of her conscience. She definitely stepped out of the generally accepted role of women in Puritan society. Ultimately, she was a victim of both secular and church politics, but she was also a woman who insisted on her religious liberty.

Resources
Life of Anne Hutchinson: With a Sketch of the Antinomian Controversy in Massachusetts by George E. Ellis
God In America – PBS special

Saturday, July 7, 2012

Women's Suffrage in the United States

The term “suffragist” is applied to anyone who fights for the right to vote, whether conservative or radical, male or female. The term “suffragette” is usually associated with women in England who used more radical means to get their point across; although, there were women in the US, especially in the years immediately prior to passage of the nineteenth Amendment, who used more aggressive tactics and deserve the name suffragette. Women in the US were able to vote in western states as early as 1869 (Wyoming), but finally won the right to vote in national elections with the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in time for the 1920 presidential election.



Seneca Falls Woman's Rights Convention
It is difficult to say when the women’s suffrage movement began. One landmark event, however, was the Woman’s Rights Convention in Seneca Falls, New York, held July 19 – 20, 1848. According to Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s own account it was organized on short notice. Lucretia Mott and her husband were visiting the area and five women met for tea – Lucretia Mott, Mary Ann McClintock, Martha Coffin Wright, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Jane Hunt. Together they decided to hold a convention and placed an ad in the local newspaper the next day, July 14, 1848.

The convention was attended by approximately 300 people, men and women, and resulted in the adoption of a Declaration of Sentiments. This document, written by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was loosely based on the Declaration of Independence and included the resolution to secure the franchise for women.
Resolved, that it is the duty of the women of this country to secure to themselves their sacred right to the elective franchise.
The document was signed by 68 women and 32 men. Read more about the convention and link to the Declaration of Sentiments.

The “triumvirate” of women’s suffrage in the United States
Over the 70 year period from 1848 until the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1919, there were many women involved in the movement. There are three, however, who stand out and are often referred to the "triumvirate" of woman's suffrage. Each of these women had different backgrounds and reasons for championing women's rights and the need for suffrage. Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony worked together for most of their lives leading the National Woman's Suffrage Association. Lucy Stone initially worked with them, but after the Civil War started her own organization the American Woman's Suffrage Association which was less radical than the NWSA. Eventually they reconciled and created a joint organization in 1890. Each of these women brought a unique perspective and specific gifts to the cause that made them giants in the movement.You can read more about each of these women at the links below.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815 - 1902)


In many ways, Elizabeth Cady Stanton provided the philosophical bedrock for the women’s movement in the United States. She is known for fighting for women’s suffrage, but she never lost sight of the bigger picture of women’s rights or other reform issues. Throughout her long life she would concern herself with such things as the abolition of slavery, the right for married women to own property, birth control, custody for mothers, education for girls, and relief for suffering families after the Civil War. Her overriding concern was that all individuals have the right of self-determination and should be allowed to have all the tools necessary to do this. Continue reading.


Lucy Stone (1818 – 1893)

Lucy Stone was born in 1818, the eighth of nine children to Francis and Hannah Matthews Stone. Unlike Stanton, she was not born into a family of means. Francis Stone owned a small farm in Massachusetts where everyone in the family had to contribute to survive. The boys fished and hunted; the girls made cheese and did piecework to help make ends meet. Francis was also a drinking man and one that believed firmly in a “woman’s place.” He was physically and verbally abusive and Hannah often had to beg him for money to get things for the girls. Where Stanton’s father wished she were a boy because he wanted a boy, Lucy’s mother wished she and her sisters were boys because “a woman’s life is so hard.” Read more.

Susan B Anthony (1820 – 1906)

Susan Brownell Anthony was the second of seven children born to Lucy Read and Daniel Anthony on February 15, 1820. While Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucy Stone grew up with the idea that it was a disadvantage to be a woman; that wasn’t the case with Susan. Daniel Anthony was a Quaker who instilled in his children a sense of their own self-worth and that of all human beings. Although women and men sat on opposite sides of the meeting house, Susan’s grandmother was an elder and her aunt preached freely when she was moved to do so. Her grandfather believed so strongly in education that he built a school on his own property for his children and the neighbors. Later when Susan’s teacher didn’t see the need to teach girls long division, Daniel Anthony did the same thing. Continue reading.

Women have a rich history in American and the world. In the 21st century we have a lot to thank these women for, but more work is still to be done. Please leave comments or questions. Thanks for reading.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Writing about Women's Suffrage

I started a blog on women in history over on wordpress.com. Frankly, I wish I had started it here at blogger, but I was experimenting with the platform. Nevertheless, the blog has sort of taken off. A friend from long ago, who I reconnected with on Facebook, asked if she could write for it and of course I said yes. Her area of expertise is in British royalty. And I do mean expertise. Although she has never worked as an historian, her degree is in history and she has read extensively over the years in her area of interest. Me - I'm all over the map. I just love history! I read a little of this and that. Lately I have been reading American History specifically about the women's suffrage movement, so I pulled this book back off the shelf. It's an excellent book for those interested in the time period from the 1840s up to about 1900. It does not cover the last wave of suffragists such as Alice Paul and Lucy Burns who brought it home. Here's a minimal review I wrote at Goodreads. Check out the book if you're interested in the time period.

If you want to check out my blog on women's history here it is - Saints, Sisters, and Sluts.

Other Powers: The Age of Suffrage, Spiritualism, and the Scandalous Victoria WoodhullOther Powers: The Age of Suffrage, Spiritualism, and the Scandalous Victoria Woodhull by Barbara Goldsmith
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I've read this book twice, because I enjoyed it so much. I would say it is more a history book than a biography although I put it in both categories. Victoria Woodhull appears throughout the book, but the main focus is on the suffrage and spiritualism movements. You become acquainted with other personalities that are important in this period in history such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Henry Ward Beecher, Harriot Beecher Stowe, among others. Definitely a good choice if you're interested in this period in American History or women's issues.

Of particular interest to me is the history of women's suffrage in the United States. Although women spoke out for their rights prior to 1848, many mark the Seneca Falls Woman's Convention as the beginning of the fight for women's suffrage. It took 70 long years and only one of the signers of the "Declaration of Sentiments" at the convention lived to see the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920.

The people involved in the suffrage movement were often involved in other reform movements such as abolition and temperance, and were very diverse. This created conflicts of both personality and conscience making for a very interesting read.

View all my reviews